首页 » ORACLE 9i-23c » Troubleshooting ORA-00600: [kpncxcc-1] from dblink & ORA-01801

Troubleshooting ORA-00600: [kpncxcc-1] from dblink & ORA-01801

  • 2017/02/27
  • ORACLE 9i-23c
  • 734 views
  • Troubleshooting ORA-00600: [kpncxcc-1] from dblink & ORA-01801已关闭评论

前几日一数据库实例alert日志中出现了ORA-600 [kpncxcc-1],  kpn开头的函数通常用于服务器之间通信, 从trace中也可以发现是一条调用了dblink的select,  在MOS未发现已知BUG, 下面是分享这个案例及我的排查思路.

# trace file

Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
ORACLE_HOME = /oracle/app/oracle/product/11.2.0.3/dbhome_1
System name:    HP-UX
Node name:      weejar1
Release:        B.11.31
Version:        U
Machine:        ia64
Instance name: anbob1
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
Oracle process number: 714
Unix process pid: 6006, image: oracle@weejar1
*** 2017-02-23 10:27:08.207
*** SESSION ID:(3801.15219) 2017-02-23 10:27:08.207
*** CLIENT ID:() 2017-02-23 10:27:08.207
*** SERVICE NAME:(SYS$USERS) 2017-02-23 10:27:08.207
*** MODULE NAME:(PL/SQL Developer) 2017-02-23 10:27:08.207
*** ACTION NAME:(SQL 窗口 - 新建) 2017-02-23 10:27:08.207
Dump continued from file: /oracle/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/tyjc/anbob1/trace/anbob1_ora_6006.trc
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kpncxcc-1], [12], [5], [7], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
========= Dump for incident 1573713 (ORA 600 [kpncxcc-1]) ========
*** 2017-02-23 10:27:08.209
dbkedDefDump(): Starting incident default dumps (flags=0x2, level=3, mask=0x0)

----- Current SQL Statement for this session (sql_id=gas0mmvd8fkar) -----
SELECT t.*,t.rowid FROM common.t_ucp_staffrole@lnk_db1.anbob.com t where enddate<sysdate

----- Abridged Call Stack Trace -----
ksedsts()+544<-kjzdssdmp()+400<-kjzdpcrshnfy()+512<-kstdmp()+416<-dbkedDefDump()+6032<-ksedmp()+64<-ksfdmp()
+96<-$cold_dbgexPhaseII()+576<-dbgexProcessError()+2096<-dbgeExecuteForError()+288<-dbgePostErrorKGE()+2368
<-dbkePostKGE_kgsf()+128<-kgeadse()+800<-kgerinv_internal()+80
<-kgerinv()+96<-kgeasnmierr()+144<-kpncxcc()+1456<-kpnrfcxc()+512<-kpnxrfc()+448<-kpnfchcbk()+448
----- End of Abridged Call Stack Trace -----

Note:
这是一个11.2.0.3 RAC on HPUX的环境, 是PL/SQL DEV用户客户端在执行一条SELECT 带DBLINK的语句触发. MOS中存在一个使用DBLINK和JDBC时的BUG与本案例不符, 在sqlplus中运行该SQL可以重现该问题.

SQL> SELECT t.*,t.rowid FROM common.t_ucp_staffrole@lnk_tbcs_a1.hebei.mobile.com t where enddate<sysdate;
ERROR:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kpncxcc-1], [12], [5], [7], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
no rows selected

遇到该类问题,先去数据库的源端运行,查看是否同样存在该问题, 查看源表是否存在异常,下面在dblink的源库执行上面的查询.

SQL> select * from  common.T_UCP_STAFFROLE where  enddate<sysdate;
ERROR:
ORA-01801: date format is too long for internal buffer
no rows selected

源端数据库同样无法执行, 不过是执行报错ORA-1801错误, 从错误的提示看应试是日期格式的记录存在异常. 该错误使用CTAS 方法无法验证无效记录, 测试是表有问题还是部分记录问题.

SQL> @desc  common.T_UCP_STAFFROLE 
           Name                            Null?    Type
           ------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------
    1      ROLEID                                   VARCHAR2(30)
    2      STAFFID                                  VARCHAR2(20)
    3      CONDITIONSTR                             VARCHAR2(500)
    4      HOSTEDCCID                               VARCHAR2(20)
    5      STATUS                                   NUMBER(2)
    6      STATUSDATE                               DATE
    7      CREATEDATE                               DATE
    8      ORGAID                                   VARCHAR2(32)
    9      BEGINDATE                                DATE
   10      ENDDATE                                  DATE

SQL> select * from nls_database_parameters; 
PARAMETER                      VALUE
------------------------------ ----------------------------------------
NLS_DATE_FORMAT                DD-MON-RR
NLS_DATE_LANGUAGE              AMERICAN
NLS_TIME_FORMAT                HH.MI.SSXFF AM
NLS_TIMESTAMP_FORMAT           DD-MON-RR HH.MI.SSXFF AM
NLS_TIME_TZ_FORMAT             HH.MI.SSXFF AM TZR
NLS_TIMESTAMP_TZ_FORMAT        DD-MON-RR HH.MI.SSXFF AM TZR
...
SQL> select * from nls_session_parameters; 
PARAMETER                    VALUE
---------------------------- --------------------------------
NLS_DATE_FORMAT              YYYYMMDD HH24:MI:SS
NLS_DATE_LANGUAGE            AMERICAN
NLS_SORT                     BINARY
NLS_TIME_FORMAT              HH.MI.SSXFF AM
NLS_TIMESTAMP_FORMAT         DD-MON-RR HH.MI.SSXFF AM
NLS_TIME_TZ_FORMAT           HH.MI.SSXFF AM TZR
NLS_TIMESTAMP_TZ_FORMAT      DD-MON-RR HH.MI.SSXFF AM TZR
...


SQL>  alter session set NLS_DATE_FORMAT='DD-MON-RR';
Session altered.

SQL> select * from  common.T_UCP_STAFFROLE where  enddate<sysdate; ERROR: ORA-01801: date format is too long for internal buffer SQL> select * from dba_indexes
  2  where (owner, index_name) in
  3  (select c.name, b.name
  4  from ind$ a, obj$ b, user$ c
  5  where to_char (a.spare6, 'DD-MON-YY') ='00-000-00' and
  6  b.obj# = a.obj# and c.user# = b.owner#);
no rows selected

SQL> create table tt as select * from common.T_UCP_STAFFROLE  where rownum<10; Table created. SQL> select * from tt where  enddate<sysdate; no rows selected SQL> create table tt tablespace users as select * from common.t_ucp_staffrole;
Table created.

SQL> select * from tt where  enddate<sysdate;
ERROR:
ORA-01801: date format is too long for internal buffer

Note:
上面尝试了修改SESSION DATA FORMAT和system相同问题依旧存在,排除了参数date format的可能; 且CTAS复制的表同样存在问题, 应试是部分记录有问题, 该表存在4个date类型列, 因select * 所以4个列都有异常记录的可能,不一定是条件中的enddate列, 其实去掉where条件查询一样报错, 只是表中存在几十万记录,不如遍历所有数据等到报错比较久. 下面使用排除法逐个验证.对于日期记录的问题通常要么是最大或最小值比较另类.

SQL> select min(STATUSDATE),min(CREATEDATE),min(BEGINDATE),min(ENDDATE) from common.T_UCP_STAFFROLE ;
ERROR:
ORA-01801: date format is too long for internal buffer
no rows selected

SQL> select min(STATUSDATE),min(CREATEDATE)  from common.T_UCP_STAFFROLE where enddate<sysdate;
ERROR:
ORA-01801: date format is too long for internal buffer
no rows selected

SQL> select min(STATUSDATE)  from common.T_UCP_STAFFROLE where enddate<sysdate;
ERROR:
ORA-01801: date format is too long for internal buffer
no rows selected

SQL> select  min(CREATEDATE)  from common.T_UCP_STAFFROLE where enddate<sysdate;
MIN(CREATEDATE)
-----------------
20130912 19:21:36

NOTE:
定位到了列STATUSDATE, 下面就要找出这个列中无效记录. 我们可以使用to_char格式化后看最大和最小的几行记录应该可以排查.

SQL> select * from (
  2  select rowid rid,to_char(STATUSDATE,'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') , dense_rank() over (order by statusdate ) rn
  3    from common.T_UCP_STAFFROLE 
  4    ) where rn<=5;
RID                TO_CHAR(STATUSDATE,         RN
------------------ ------------------- ----------
AAAClXAE9AAA2ROAAA 0000-00-00 00:00:00          1
AAAClXAAuAADkqsAC9 0000-00-00 00:00:00          2
AAAClXAAuAADkqsAC+ 0000-00-00 00:00:00          2  
AAAClXAAsAADf43ACm 2002-03-22 12:02:07          3
AAAClXAAtAADg6oAAY 2002-04-12 15:22:34          4
AAAClXAAtAADg68AE2 2002-04-12 15:22:34          4
AAAClXAAtAADg68AE3 2002-04-12 15:22:34          4
AAAClXAAtAADg68AE0 2002-04-12 15:22:34          4
AAAClXAAtAADg6oAAc 2002-04-12 15:22:34          4
AAAClXAAsAADf4PAAw 2002-04-21 16:14:02          5
AAAClXAAtAADg6ZACg 2002-04-21 16:14:02          5
AAAClXAAsAADf4fABw 2002-04-21 16:14:02          5
AAAClXAAsAADf4fABX 2002-04-21 16:14:02          5
AAAClXAAsAADf4bAEO 2002-04-21 16:14:02          5

Note:
前三条非常可疑.单独拿出来测试是否是这几条记录存在ora-1801的问题,和正常记录比对

SQL> select  STATUSDATE   from common.T_UCP_STAFFROLE where rowid='AAAClXAE9AAA2ROAAA';
ERROR:
ORA-01801: date format is too long for internal buffer
no rows selected

SQL> select  STATUSDATE   from common.T_UCP_STAFFROLE where rowid='AAAClXAAsAADf43ACm';
STATUSDATE
-----------------
20020322 12:02:07

SQL> update common.T_UCP_STAFFROLE set STATUSDATE=CREATEDATE where to_char(STATUSDATE,'yyyy')='0000';
3 rows updated.

SQL> commit;
Commit complete.

SQL>select * from common.T_UCP_STAFFROLE where  enddate<sysdate;
-- no error

Note:
就是通过上面的方法找出date类型的列值异常记录, 因日期是’0000-00-00’格式数据错误, 对于其它无效数据用最大值或月份存在’00’ 的同样可以使用to_char后验证. 解决了源库的ORA-1801错误后, dblink 远程查询ORA-600 [kpncxcc-1]的问题也不存在.

打赏

, , ,

对不起，这篇文章暂时关闭评论。

上一篇：

下一篇：